• Information about how marine animals move through the oceans has become vitally important as efforts progress to create a global plan for securing sustainable fish stocks in the high seas. Researchers are integrating new technologies and applying new approaches to data sets to find answers.
  • A recent examination of the long-term Tagging Of Pelagic Predators (TOPP) data set has mapped the travel patterns of marine predators – select whale, turtle, tuna, shark, and seabird species – through their life cycles.
  • The study showed that many of these predators spend over half their time on the high seas, supporting the need for global strategies to protect and monitor the high seas. Vessel Identification systems paired with several emerging satellite technologies can help.

Of gaps and limitations

Our record of knowledge about sea animals is full of holes. We may study and record sea lion colonies or sea turtle nesting and hatching events as they take over a shoreline, with hordes of baby turtles or seals making a run for the sea. Then they disappear from record until the next observable event, perhaps next breeding season. What do they do in between? Where do they go in their travels?

Leatherback turtle hatchlings crawling to the sea. Image courtesy of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region via Wikimedia Commons.

In “The political biogeography of migratory marine predators,” Harrison and colleagues sought to learn more about the lives of marine animals in the high seas. They went to the TOPP (Tagging Of Pelagic Predators) data set compiled years before by Barbara Block and Dan Costa.

“One of the largest animal tracking data sets in the world,” according to Harrison, the TOPP study generated a valuable resource for researchers studying Pacific marine animals and large sea birds. Yet much of the tracking was done using early-generation tagging systems, and the data contain a lot of noise.

Great white shark saying hello. Found frequently along the coasts of countries across the globe, white sharks also hunt on the high seas. Hermanus Backpackers via Wikimedia Commons, CC 2.0.

Gaps in data transmission caused when an animal dives deeply or for a long time and a tag doesn’t transmit;

Varying durations in track length because some animals were tracked for five years, and others for just one;

Original tags that lacked sufficient battery life to transmit continuously, providing an animal’s location every hour or every four hours.

The need to conserve battery power required some tracking tags as recently as 2003 to run on a “duty cycle.”

Male elephant seal C49 with two tags on its head. The satellite tag allows researchers to track the animal globally. The smaller radio transmitter tag allows the instrument to be recovered when the animal is on the beach. The satellite tag transmits when the animal surfaces. With their deep dives and rapid surface intervals, elephants seals are difficult to locate visually. Image by Daniel Costa, University of California, Santa Cruz. CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

“We had to program the tag to perhaps turn on for three days, off for two weeks,” Harrison said. “Or maybe they transmit for eight hours and they’re off for two days.” To circumvent sampling irregularities, Harrison and co-researcher Arliss Winship applied modeling techniques to the TOPP data.

The TOPP study tracked many species simultaneously to remove the confounding effects of comparing animal movements across different climatic conditions. Periodic climatic events such as El Niño can impact animal behavior.

“Animals studied in the same year in the same place, are experiencing the same ocean,” Harrison said. “So if their behaviors differ, it might be because they use the ocean differently, not because the ocean itself is different.”

Using the TOPP data set, Harrison and colleagues were able to fill information gaps about the lives of more than 1,600 predatory marine animals – sharks, whales, seals, sea birds, tunas, and sea turtles – and show how much of their lives they spend in the largely unregulated waters known as the high seas. The researchers hope their results will help managers protect these animals in the future.

Schematic of the movements of more than 1,600 animals of 14 species in the data set of the Tagging of Pelagic Predators (TOPP) study. On the left are daily locations of tagged animals across the Pacific Ocean. On the right are the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of various countries– white areas represent the high seas. Image is Figure 1 of Harrison et al (2018). “The political biogeography of migratory marine predators” courtesy of Autumn-Lynn Harrison and Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Managing fisheries on the high seas

Global marine management has been slow in coming. However, from the June Charlevoix Blueprint for Healthy Oceans summit of G7 Leaders to the November Our Ocean Conference in Bali, 2018 has seen a growing global commitment to agreements that would manage the “Wild West” of the high seas more sustainably.

Tech collaborations aim to address everything from diminishing fish stocks and endangered species to climate change impacts and coastal vulnerabilities. Some 60 nations have agreed to monitor and manage fisheries globally as part of the IMCS (International Monitoring, Control and Surveillance) network.

But species attrition continues at an unsustainable pace under current monitoring and management efforts, so the need for all-in cooperation is urgent.

“I was motivated to do this study to provide information that’s useful for management and for these ongoing high seas treaty negotiations,” Harrison said. “I think the power of what we did was to show these patterns across multiple species because it strengthens the evidence that the high seas is an important place for migratory marine predators, not just one, not just two, but tens.”

Besides knowing where the fish are, it’s also important to know where the fishing is happening in order to prevent over-fishing. In the world of illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing, identifying smaller fishing boats remains a challenge. While large ships are required to use AIS (Automatic Identification System), the technology is considered too onerous for smaller boats, which, taken together, account for a large portion of IUU fishing. As AIS technology becomes more affordable, many researchers recommend requiring all ships, no matter the size, to broadcast identification data.

David Kroodsma, chief research scientist for Global Fishing Watch, looks to the latest satellite technologies to document unauthorized fishing activity. Kroodsma acknowledges that satellite technology has the potential to provide remote viewing and a record of proof, but it isn’t ready to monitor a given location in real time.

“You can’t track the movement of boats the same way you can with AIS or VMS,” Kroodsma said, “because you’re getting like one picture per day.” Or at the current state-of-the-art, two pictures a day.

Pacific bluefin tuna weigh in at up to 450 kg (990 lb) and can reach 3 meters (10 ft) in length and are heavily fished. They are warm-blooded so can still chase prey even in colder waters. Image by aes256 via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.1 jp.

Kroodsma’s team researches ways to combine technologies and essentially triangulate around the information gaps.

“For instance, you can take an image from a satellite and combine it with AIS data,” says Kroodsma, “and you can tell which of those vessels [at the location of an IUU fishing event] are broadcasting and which are not.”

As a partnership between Google Earth Outreach, SkyTruth, and Oceana, Global Fishing Watch provides public access to Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data from governments willing to allow such transparency (e.g. Indonesia, Peru, Costa Rica). It also leverages satellite fleets, crunching some 60 million data points a day.

“There’s satellite radar that can see through clouds,” Kroodsma said, “and then there’s VIIRS [Visual Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (NOAA satellite enabled)],” which can see the bright lights used by fishermen looking for squid and other animals at night.

“People use [VIIRS] to look at some of these really bright vessels operating outside of Peru,” Kroodsma added. “They should have AIS because they’re really big, but you know they’re not broadcasting, you don’t see them in AIS. A lot of these sensors available don’t give you the whole picture, but by combining them you can get a really nice analysis.”

Why regulate the high seas?

Until now, the high seas were open territory, fair game for fisherman from any nation. But Harrison’s work and that of other researchers make a case for including the high seas in a comprehensive monitoring and protection program: fish and endangered predators know no boundaries.

Leatherback turtles travel thousands of kilometers/miles between their nesting beaches and feeding zones, sometimes across the Pacific Ocean. Like bluefin tuna, they can maintain body temperature in cold waters. They can also dive down to 1,280 m (4,200 ft). Image courtesy of Image by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region via Wikimedia Commons, CC 2.0.

Harrison’s study found that the leatherback turtle visits 32 countries in its long, many-thousand mile migration between breeding periods.

“Two whole years,” Harrison said, “to migrate [from Indonesia] across the Pacific Ocean to California and Mexico, and then back to breed.”

In the process, the highly endangered turtle spends roughly 78 percent of its time in the high seas, where it can be caught. “The turtle is caught as by-catch in fisheries, [and] also harvested in [and around] nesting beaches,” Harrison said. “So understanding its connectivity across countries and the high seas is really important, also knowing when it’s in the high seas and at risk of being by-caught.”

Not just the leatherback, but many endangered species face dire pressure from the ubiquitous human fishing industry.

“High seas and straddling stocks are overfished at twice the rate of those within national jurisdictions,” Daniel Dunn and colleagues found. Kroodsma’s research team also showed that five countries account for more than 85 percent of the high seas fishing.

A gray reef shark. in one study, 8 of 15 satellite tagged sharks were suspected of being illegally fished from within a shark sanctuary, prompting a recommendation for satellite monitoring of marine protected areas. Image courtesy of CRED/PIFSC, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) via Wikimedia Commons.

Even in protected areas, a study by Darcy Bradley and colleagues showed that illegal fishing of predators is common. Bradley’s team analyzed movements of 15 sharks in a protected shark sanctuary. Within three months, eight of the tagged animals had disappeared, due to illegal fishing rather than natural migration. Bradley and co-authors recommended maximizing integrating satellite technologies, including Planet’s microsatellites and DigitalGlobe’s higher-resolution satellites.

Seal you later

As the world’s political entities debate closing regulatory and monitoring loopholes, scientists are working to fill in the knowledge gaps. The work of Harrison’s team showed that some species of whales, sharks, and sea birds can range widely, spending over 60 percent of their lives in the high seas.

“An animal could spend three years in Alaska and the next year go to Hawaii,” said Aaron Carlisle, a researcher who helped tracked salmon sharks for the Harrison study.

The study solved some mysteries of the elephant seal. Before we could track seals with electronic tags, “observation bias,” based on when the seals were seen and reported, limited insights into the species’ movement patterns. Even tourists can count the crowds of elephant seals strewn across Northern California beaches at mating time as bulls wrestle and jockey for females. But it’s not easy to spot an elephant seal on the open sea.

Tagging a male elephant seal. Image by Daniel Costa, University of California, Santa Cruz, via Center for Marine Life, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

“Northern elephant seals may dive for 20 minutes and then surface just a minute or two,” Harrison said. “So unlike whales, that you can see and report to a website, when you’re in the high seas, you may never see an elephant seal. It’s just their brown head that pops up against a vast ocean, not their whole body like a whale.”

Analysis of the relatively complete TOPP data on elephant seals determined that female seals spend some 65 percent of their annual cycle on the high seas, a contrast to range maps for elephant seals from the 1980s, one of which shows their distribution just along the coast.

The analyses by Harrison and colleagues show that many marine predators spend between 45 and 75 percent of their time in the high seas. As the 2018 talks tackle the complexities of monitoring the open seas against IUU fishing, the information provided by tracking studies may help secure sustainability among key marine populations.

This article lly published on news.mongabay.com. Read the original article.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *